Alternative BAU: Immediate recovery upon cessation

We now consider the case where cessation of smoking results in immediate recovery, rather than taking 20 years for the tobacco-associated relative risks to decrease back to 1.0. The purpose here is to highlight how our assumptions about the BAU scenario can affect the predicted impact of an intervention.

The only changes that we need to make to the simulation definition are:

  1. To use a different data artifact for these simulations, where the initial prevalence of tobacco use is only defined for 3 exposure levels: never smoked, current smoker, and former smoker; and

  2. Set the recovery delay to 0 years.

Note

We could have used the same data artifact as in previous simulations, but then the tobacco component would have to manipulate the input data into the appropriate form. We instead choose to perform all input data manipulation before generating the data artifacts.

configuration:
    input_data:
        # Change this to "mslt_tobacco_maori_data_0-years.hdf" for the Maori
        # population.
        artifact_path: artifacts/mslt_tobacco_non-maori_0-years.hdf
    # Other configuration settings ...
    tobacco:
        delay: 0

These simulations are already defined in the following files:

  • Tobacco eradication:

    • mslt_tobacco_maori_0-years_decreasing_erad.yaml

    • mslt_tobacco_non-maori_0-years_decreasing_erad.yaml

  • Tobacco tax:

    • mslt_tobacco_maori_0-years_decreasing_tax.yaml

    • mslt_tobacco_non-maori_0-years_decreasing_tax.yaml

  • Tobacco-free generation:

    • mslt_tobacco_maori_0-years_decreasing_tfg.yaml

    • mslt_tobacco_non-maori_0-years_decreasing_tfg.yaml

Intervention comparison

If you run all of these simulations, you can then compare their effects (and how these differ to those obtained with the original BAU scenario), using the data analysis software of your choice.

As an example, here are some of the results obtained for non-Maori males aged 50-54 in 2011, for the tobacco eradication intervention:

Results for the tobacco eradication intervention, which yields gains in LYs, HALYs, ACMR, and YLDR.

Year of birth

Sex

Age

Year

Survivors

BAU Survivors

Population

BAU Population

ACMR

BAU ACMR

Probability of death

BAU Probability of death

Deaths

BAU Deaths

YLD rate

BAU YLD rate

Person years

BAU Person years

HALYs

BAU HALYs

LE

BAU LE

HALE

BAU HALE

1959

male

52

2011

129,460.4

129,460.4

129,850.0

129,850.0

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

389.6

389.6

0.1122

0.1122

129,655.2

129,655.2

115,103.4

115,103.4

33.6

33.1

26.5

26.0

1959

male

53

2012

129,054.2

129,047.0

129,460.4

129,460.4

0.0031

0.0032

0.0031

0.0032

406.3

413.5

0.112

0.1122

129,257.3

129,253.7

114,775.6

114,746.9

32.7

32.2

25.7

25.2

1959

male

54

2013

128,631.8

128,607.5

129,054.2

129,047.0

0.0033

0.0034

0.0033

0.0034

422.4

439.5

0.1117

0.1122

128,843.0

128,827.2

114,450.3

114,368.3

31.8

31.3

24.9

24.4

1959

male

108

2067

151.4

136.4

244.5

220.7

0.4793

0.4811

0.3808

0.3819

93.1

84.3

0.3551

0.3578

198.0

178.6

127.7

114.7

1.6

1.6

1.0

1.0

1959

male

109

2068

93.7

84.3

151.4

136.4

0.4794

0.4811

0.3809

0.3819

57.7

52.1

0.3553

0.3578

122.6

110.4

79.0

70.9

1.3

1.3

0.8

0.8

1959

male

110

2069

58.0

52.1

93.7

84.3

0.4796

0.4812

0.381

0.382

35.7

32.2

0.3554

0.3578

75.9

68.2

48.9

43.8

0.8

0.8

0.5

0.5

Note that these results differ to those obtained with the original BAU scenario.